Cool video
Jan. 10th, 2007 08:20 amThis video shows a woman's transformation from normal everyday woman to supermodel. I've watched it a bunch of times, because it's just so fascinating to see her go from a woman you wouldn't look twice at in a supermarket to a woman on a billboard.
The point of the video is sad, but admittedly I keep getting distracted by the coolness factor and don't focus so much on the message in it.
(Link spotted in
firebyrd's LJ.)
The point of the video is sad, but admittedly I keep getting distracted by the coolness factor and don't focus so much on the message in it.
(Link spotted in
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 04:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 06:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 09:23 pm (UTC)...wow. That surprises me. Major photoshop work is done even on photos of girls entering beauty contests (which strikes me as highly silly -- what, they're not going to later notice that you look different?).
I've seen shots where the model's waist was narrowed, ribs removed, to create the impossible shape that seems to be in demand.
I saw one shot where they lengthened the model's legs by 25% (she was on a couch, not standing). If they stood that image-woman up, she would have been eight feet tall. :P
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 11:00 pm (UTC)Have some evidence!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 08:10 pm (UTC)Also, nip/tuck anyone?
Just where did these "standards" came from anyways? It's not like the magazine publishers woke up one day and decided they'll start photoshopping pictures of their models. I recall reading/watching something about making the perfect woman, where the "best" eyes, ears, nose, etc. were pasted together
to form a giant fighting robot. (She looked kinda gross.) There were also studies done on the science and math of beauty, with all kinds of eye-nose, torso-lower body length, forehead width-face length ratios being deemed "most visually appealing", which I suppose is what the editing is based on. What people need to realize is that there is no way all of these qualities can be found on one person, as Void said quoting Wilde.no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 09:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 05:08 pm (UTC)I had a...I hesitate to say 'friend,' but the relative of a friend whom we helped out in a number of situations. She was a model. Did the exotic photo-shoots and the full bit. Had this huge luggage set filled with makeup stuffs. She was...very unattractive without it. When in full model mode, I didn't find her much more attractive. Less acne, and various other obvious skin problems were covered...I guess I subscribe a bit to the Oscar Wilde idea - "The only perfection lies in being flawed, the only flawlessness lies in imperfection." Its the trying to be so much more than you are that I find disturbing and hideous unattractive. 'Faustian Striving' I think the phrase is.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 06:45 pm (UTC)I sort of feel bad for these women -- imagine walking down the street and having someone say 'Hey, aren't you X? Boy, you're ugly without your makeup on!'. When it seems all they have is their looks, that must be especially painful.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 06:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 06:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 06:50 pm (UTC)I find it really creepy that they have to lengthen the model's neck and give her a completely new set of eyes. I hear that they'll sometimes even crop one model's head onto another model's body, so I guess you can never be sure if you're looking at one whole woman or a dab of this and a dab of that.
I'd love to see a fitness or beauty magazine that had the guts to show unretouched photos of models who did their OWN hair and makeup. Or, if that's too revolutionary, at least some of those ubiquitous "before" and "after" pics that had equal amounts of hairstylin', makeup, and flatteringly-colored clothing in both photos.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 06:54 pm (UTC)I'd love to see that as well, but I bet it wouldn't sell. I don't totally blame the magazines/makeup companies/etc for this issue, the buyers are just as much at fault. :/
I hear that they'll sometimes even crop one model's head onto another model's body
It must be so depressing to be a model. Not only are you valued for only your looks (and how long will those last?), you can have your parts interchanged with other parts and no one would care.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 07:25 pm (UTC)I dated a girl in highschool who ended up being a model, she moved to France and poses there for cosmetic and clothing photoshoots.
Funny thing is I did recognize her in some pictures (never really looked for any, but my mom reads those crappy glossy magazines and then goes like "Oh my god, look its Rachel!") but somehow she never looked the same... this explains why though.
Kinda sad, those small imperfections were always what attracted me in some way, as with the said girl, I used to love those few freckles on her nose and the blemishes she had on her lower stomach (and she had a few more pounds, thus a nicer ass), and now it does make an awful lot of sense why those freckles arent in her pics anymore.
Eh.. call me old-fashioned (or a godless savage pagan, /poke nai) but I like the natural looks of a girl way better than any of this.. just the face you see when waking up together. Im probably weird for saying that but meh,Im known for being weird. >_>
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 09:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 09:25 pm (UTC)(or a godless savage pagan, /poke nai)
We can be godless together, baby~
no subject
Date: 2007-01-11 10:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-12 05:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-12 05:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-12 06:38 pm (UTC):D