Stupid lottery... (FFXI)
Jun. 30th, 2008 08:05 amThere's one thing I'm very happy about in this whole lottery event: I'm smarter RL than I am in-game. RL I never play the lottery, I know as good as no one ever wins, I know it's stupid to get your hopes up or to waste your money playing. I have no idea why I cannot apply that knowledge in-game...
60 lottery numbers, all I got was one XP scroll on Thistle, eight of them on mules (but only one can use one). On Thistle I was one number away from winning the second highest prize! ARG! 1017 and I had 1317 (and that was on my main too, so wouldn't have been a wasted rare/ex).
Stupid lottery. Stupid me. More stupid me than anything else. At least now I get a ton of space back, but I still feel amazingly stupid for having been involved with this. Lotteries are a tax on the stupid. I guess I'm paid up for this year.
60 lottery numbers, all I got was one XP scroll on Thistle, eight of them on mules (but only one can use one). On Thistle I was one number away from winning the second highest prize! ARG! 1017 and I had 1317 (and that was on my main too, so wouldn't have been a wasted rare/ex).
Stupid lottery. Stupid me. More stupid me than anything else. At least now I get a ton of space back, but I still feel amazingly stupid for having been involved with this. Lotteries are a tax on the stupid. I guess I'm paid up for this year.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-30 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-30 03:43 pm (UTC)*rolls* That would so beat my desk job.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-30 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-30 03:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-30 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-30 06:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-30 11:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 10:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 03:55 pm (UTC)500,000 users (according to census) x 10 marbles x 0.00001 chance of winning rank 1.
However, even assuming one mule per user - people with more than one far outweighs people with none - the number of winners become much lower than expected.
</devil's advocate>
It's a non-issue with me (though if they really rigged it I'd probably be more peeved off), but it does look rather neat and tidy ;). Though probability is probability, and the world will never know unless the drawing was done physically (unlikely) via live international broadcast (FFXI Channel go?). ;D
no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-30 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-30 06:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-30 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-30 06:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-30 08:08 pm (UTC)Regardless, if they were going to pick five separate numbers, they really should have said so. I think most people were under the impression that it was going to be a single number. I certainly was. (It turned out not to matter for me, since I didn't match *any* of the last two digit combinations, but I would have been really annoyed if I had the last two digits of, say, the five-digit number.)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-30 08:26 pm (UTC)On Thistle, I had the last four numbers of the five-digit one. ><
I'm really rather disgruntled.
It's not a tax on the stupid
Date: 2008-07-01 09:21 am (UTC)I take offense to your comment, you'd have said something else if you won on your marbles. Not everyone walks away a winner from any lotto.
Re: It's not a tax on the stupid
Date: 2008-07-01 08:35 pm (UTC)If you took offense, sorry. However, no matter if I had won or lost, I would have said the same thing. I would have been happier, but my opinion would not have been different.
However, what