thistlechaser: (Cat with book: Yawn)
Swordbird by Nancy Yi Fan
Rating: Disliked (Hated-Disliked-Okay-Liked-Loved)



Khumba:


I love "takling animal" stories -- stories about animals that have societies and cultures and all that. So, when I spotted Swordbird, it immediately caught my attention. Looking further into it, I discovered it was written by a 12 year old girl. If it had been self-published, I would have run screaming. However, not only was it published by a major publisher (HarperCollins), it's part of a series she wrote and was published by them.

A 12 year old? With books published by a major publisher? Using a theme I like? Sold!

So how was it? While the writing was fine, I barely got more than 10% into it before I gave up on it. I could ignore issues like "How the hell do simple birds, bluejays and stuff, carry and use swords while flying? A sword would weight more than the entire flock of them!", but the issue that I couldn't accept was how one–dimensional the bad guy was. He literally cackled and talked out loud about how much he loves torturing people (other birds) and how much he loves whipping them and oh boy he'd get to whip some soon and evil evil I'm so evil look at me being evil.

Before I decided to give up on the book, I watched a totally unrelated movie on Netflix: Khumba. It turned out to be lucky timing, since, while the movie was average, that bad guy was multi–dimensional made the whole movie work for me.

Roger Ebert described Khumba as a "copy and paste movie". Even before I read his review, I noticed the elements of Lion King, Ice Age, and Madagascar in it. I didn't mind it, but it was kind of odd. Songs, characters, elements of the plot, even the voices all felt familiar.

Khumba was made by African animation studios and production companies, and won a number of awards there. While much of the animation was typical movie-quality CGI, there were elements of it that were really, really well done and pretty. I loved the leopard's/bad guy's fur pattern, and the way they animated his ability to track things by scent was amazing and beautiful.

Swordbird: Evil, Evil McEvil bad guy wants to make every bird in the world his slave so he always has someone to whip and torture.
Khumba: A zebra is born with half of his stripes faded out, so is disliked and picked on by his herd, and leaves to find a way to get his stripes back. While he was hated by the others because he "caused" a drought (there was a prophecy stating a half-zebra would cause the rain to stop falling forever), he was also the subject of a prophecy in the leopard society -- unknown to the zebras.

While Khumba was just a "throw away movie", something to fill a couple hours for me last night, because of the bad guy's interesting story, multiple motivations, and background story, the movie worked for me.
Swordbirds was supposed to be a special book, and I thought I'd enjoy it a lot, but it utterly failed for me because the bad guy lacked everything Khumba's had.

I gave Swordbirds a disliked instead of hated rating because it was written by a 12 year old. I do wonder how much she herself wrote and how much her parents/editors helped, but assuming she really did write it, she did a surprisingly good job. I can't expect a 12 year old to understand that shades of grey are better than black/white when it comes to characters, but hopefully she'll pick up on that as she continues writing.

As I didn't get even close to the 50% mark of the book, it doesn't count towards my goal for the year. Alas, I don't think I'll be reaching my 50 book per year goal, as it's April and I've only finished eight of them. So so so many started and not finished this year...

Next up: Gilded, one of the three oldest books in my To Read pile. I think it was recommended by someone on my friends list years ago. I have (had...) no idea what it was about, until I glanced at the Amazon page just now (wish I hadn't skimmed, it's a lot of fun going into a book 100% blind as to what it's about).
thistlechaser: (Book with cat: sickening)
The IX by Andrew P. Weston
Rating: Disliked (Hated-Disliked-Okay-Liked-Loved)
Book received free for review from Perseid Press.



If I wrote a book, I'd be worried sick about errors in it. Typos, random blank pages, chunks of missing text, that sort of thing. After it was published, I'd do a whole lot of checking of it. I'd like to think I'd read the whole thing once it was available to the public, but perhaps that's unrealistic. I'd sure as hell spot-check chapters, including important ones like the first and last ones.

The IX was swimming in issues and errors. The intro had odd line breaks and numbers showing up mid-text (as if someone had taken a layout meant for a physical version of the book and used it as-is for the ebook version). All the chapters I read (intro, first, and second) had serious, serious problems. Things like multiple paragraphs having multiple sentences where the text all ran together (sentence after sentence of no space between words). Imaginereadingabookandthensuddenlycomingacrossthissortofthing.Itwasbothsurprisingandveryannoying. Then the text would go back to normal for another paragraph or so. Simple skimming, let alone spell checking, would have found this sort of thing.

Based on those issues, I figured this was a self-published book. However, when I checked into it, I found it was published by Perseid Press. Wondering if that was just a front for some self-publishing group, I checked their About Us section of their site:

Perseid Press is a small independent publisher dedicated to marketing exemplary works of fiction. More, at Perseid Press we are striving to perfect the reading experience by offering the highest quality literature in pleasing packages meticulously produced to result in our readers’ lasting enjoyment.

Yeah no.

On the writing/story? The writing was okay at best (dialogue more of an info dump than realistic). The plot seemed like an interesting idea (some distant future alien race was getting their asses kicked by some other alien race, so they made some kind of wormhole technology to bring warriors from the past (Earth) into their time/planet to all fight together against the aliens), but I hadn't read enough to be able to comment if it worked or not. There were just way, way too many quality issues for me to continue with this book.

Since I fell well short of reaching the 50% mark, The IX does not count towards my 50 book per year goal.

(Edit: *peers at cover* While that's bigger than I had intended, I wish I had seen it that size before accepting it for review. It would have saved me from the trouble of starting it. Is that a comma in that blurb? "Sometimes, death is only the beginning of the adventure"? Why in the world would you put a comma there? It'd be so much more snappy (and correct) without it!)

---

I finished House of Cards last night. While I loved the first season, I didn't enjoy the second or third ones at all. By the time I finished the third, I was just happy to be over and done with it. Perhaps I should have spread out the episodes more, but two seasons of bad people doing bad things became a bit much. By the time I reached the cliffhanger at the end of season three, I couldn't care less what happened to them.

I got more enjoyment from the Sesame Street parody of the show than I had from the whole first two seasons of it. Linked by [livejournal.com profile] gmth in the comments on a post yesterday. Here in case you missed it:



Not sure what I'm going to watch next. I might return to Farscape or The 100, or start something new.
thistlechaser: (Book with cat 5)
Flower's Fang by Madison Keller
Rating: Okay (Hated-Disliked-Okay-Liked-Loved)



This was a frustrating book. It's easy to hate a badly written book or love a good one, but this book was close to being one I could love, it just fell short in a couple big areas.

The story was set on an alien/fantasy/something world where the dominant species were a plant-based humanish(?) one and a dog-human one.

Big issue #1: In a 353 page book, we never once got a description of what the plant-based race looked like. We learned that their hair(?) has flowers in it. Their feet(?) either have roots or are roots. Very late in the book we learned that they have a different color blood (sap?). What color was their skin? Did they even have two legs? Two eyes? I learned more while googling for a picture of the cover to include in this review than I did in the entire book. (The author made this plush toy of the plant-based main character. So... green skinned.) (Edit: After making this post, I see you can tell skin color and number of limbs from the cover image, but my Kindle is black and white, and the cover images are about an inch big, so you can't really see much at all. You shouldn't have to rely on the cover to know what a main character looks like.)

So, back to the plot. The dog species (basically dogs who could walk on two legs or four; furry, tails, ears, all that) was all about size and strength. The main dog character was literally half the size of everyone else, white furred when everyone else was brown or black, had a curly tail when everyone else had a straight one, and floppy ears when everyone else had pricked up ones.

The plant species was smaller and weaker. They were all magic users -- magic was natural to them. The main plant character was: 1) A prince of his species. 2) Couldn't do any magic.

Big Issue #2: While it makes sense that both of these characters would be outcasts, it was way, way over the top. Even the prince's mother didn't believe in him (in one scene, the prince was clearly in very bad pain and fainted -- his mother said he was faking it). And the dog girl? A male character who was basically the alpha of his generation bullied her endlessly (makes sense), but then suddenly decided he wanted to (have her as his mate? have sex with her? rape her?) even to the point of using a date rape drug on her. (Nevermind there had been no indication at all before this that the world had drugs at all -- every member of the plant species other than the prince could do healing magic, so no need for drugs.) Every Single Person in the whole entire world* hated and bullied these two characters. (*Other than the dog girl's parents.) It was just so over the top 'everyone must crap on these two'. The mother not believing her son was really in pain/really fainted was the last straw for me.

Through the first 60% of the book, I loved it. Was it perfect? No, but the world was interesting and I liked the two races. By 80%, my enjoyment of it quickly cooled, and I started reading faster/skimming. By 90% I had lost all interest in it. I haven't actually finished it yet, but I think I'm going to move on to the next book instead of continuing with Flower's Fang.

I'm frustrated, because I think this author is close to being really good. I did enjoy much of the book (which is why I gave it an 'okay' rating even though I'm not going to finish it). I'm not sure how her editors/beta readers didn't point out the lack of a description of the plant species. (She wasn't lacking in other sorts of descriptions, settings and objects and such.)

Dialing back the "everyone HATES these two!!!!" would have made all the difference for me. I'm 100% fine with outcast characters, and it makes sense that at least the dog character was. (The plant character was both a prince and a nice guy, so I less buy that everyone in the world hated him. True he couldn't do magic, but that was hidden and the general population didn't know about it.)

Sadly, I won't be reading the next book in this series, but if she keeps publishing, I'd be perfectly willing to give some future book a chance.
thistlechaser: (Moon)
Snow Flower: Arara's Tale by Madison Keller
Rating: Liked (Hated-Disliked-Okay-Liked-Loved)



Look at the book's cover. Look at my rating for this book. Doesn't seem to match, does it?

I got this book expecting it to be awful. I mean, look at the cover! Yeah, yeah, "You can't tell a book by its cover", except usually you can.

While Snow Flower was far from perfect, it was a surprisingly enjoyable read.

It takes place on a fantasy world? alien planet? Somewhere where dogs(?) are the dominant species. There's some other race of things as well (something that's "cold to the touch"), but I have no idea what they're supposed to be.

One of the big downsides of this book was that we were missing all backstory and description -- it's a prequel set in the world of the first book, so I suppose all the information is in that.

The dogs(?) are evolved(?), they can stand and walk on two legs if they want, but are also comfortable on four. They wear minimal clothing (shorts and a harness), and can talk plus have some sort of mental communication system (only within their pack?).

The packs (basically like a town, I think) have alphas/betas/omegas, and the story was about the girl puppy of an omega couple. She was bullied badly, but because of the pack social structure it was an okay thing to do.

For all I didn't know about the story, I quite liked it. That surprises the hell out of me, because... look at that cover. This novella is currently free on Amazon (click the link at the top of this post if you like -- I get nothing if you do). I enjoyed it enough that I paid for the next book, and will be reading it next.

---

The new Walking Dead spin-off has a name: Fear the Walking Dead. *cough* Quite, um, original.. I guess they wanted to be sure that people knew the new show was related to the first one. It stars someone named Cliff Curtis, and is set in LA in the early days of the zombie outbreak.

I'll be checking it out, once it airs.

In health news, I'm still quite red all over and feel not so great. Luckily I haven't been light-headed or fainting, but I still feel pretty blah. I took my last pill of the antibiotic I was allergic to on Wednesday night, so you'd think this would be out of my system by now (Google tells me it can take a few days though). I have an appointment with my new doctor on Monday for a follow-up.
thistlechaser: (Cat with book: Yawn)
Warbreaker by Brandon Sanderson
Rating: Disliked (Hated-Disliked-Okay-Liked-Loved)



There were two quotes from this book that could sum the whole thing up:

Random character said (paraphrasing, since I didn't mark the quote):
War is coming, you say? War's been coming for generations, it'll be coming for generations more. What makes now different? Nothing.

The author wrote:
My books, I know, can be kind of slow sometimes. That comes from the fact that I, myself, like to read books that are kind of slow.

There's a slow book and then there's this book. 688 pages, and by the halfway point, not a single sign of real plot movement. "War is coming," but like the character said: It's been coming for generations, and it'd likely be coming for generations more. Just low level hostility between two nations.

Three-quarters of the way through the book, still not much happening. Nice world building? Yeah. Interesting magic system? Meh, sort of. But so little plot. Add onto that that I hated two of the three main characters, and this book was a chore to read.

It was such a shame, I had been saving this book for when I was sure I'd need a good one. (I loved his other books so much, and everyone said such good things about this one...)

I'd explain the plot, but I already did. War is coming (slowly, with no real effort, energy, or drive behind it). Some people wanted it to happen, most didn't.

There were a group of "physical" gods in the book (gods in physical human bodies, sort of). They were the most awful, unenjoyable people to read about.

Twice in the book, characters did a 180 on personality. The first time, a group of people acted as friends, then betrayed one of the main characters. Usually I like plot twists, but this pissed me off as there were no indications that I could see that it would happen -- it felt like the characters were changed mid-story just as a plot device. Then, as annoyed as I was at that happening, it happened a second time!

Blah. As much as I usually like his work, I'm hard-pressed to name a single thing I liked about it. It even had many editing issues (missing periods, lots of missing capitalization, multiple characters' dialogue in the same paragraph). Okay, one thing I did like was the 'twist' that explained the title.

---

In non-book news, saw my podiatrist today about my toe. She pulled the stuck-in gauze out OW OW OW. Big open raw/bloody section again now. Ow. I'm on another run of antibiotics for it, one I might be allergic to (but it's also the most effective one against MRSA, so... the allergist couldn't narrow down what I was allergic to, so she listed the antibiotic just to be safe, so we're going to take the chance).

Also spent the morning at a conference for work. Boring stuff, but it was nice to get out of the office and visit the convention center. It would have been a nice short work day, except had to go to the doctor after, so. Oh well, home now! Yay!
thistlechaser: (Book with cat: Scared)
Chaos Station by Kelly Jensen and Jenn Burke
Rating: Disliked (Hated-Disliked-Okay-Liked-Loved)
Book received free for review from Carina Press.



Usually when I accept a book for review, even if it doesn't work for me I try to get to at least the 50% point to give it a fair chance. Unfortunately Chaos Station was so full of editing and formatting issues, I couldn't get nearly that far.

The very first paragraph had an editing issue (words run together), and every page after that had at least one error or issue. I very quickly stopped being able to read the story and itched to edit it instead.

Looking over the sample chapter on Amazon, it looks like the errors don't appear in the final copy, so I'm happy for that (and it's the reason I gave it a 'disliked' rating instead of 'hated').

I'm not counting Chaos Station towards my 50 book goal, as I didn't reach at least the halfway point.

Reading next: Warbreaker by Brandon Sanderson.
thistlechaser: (Cat with book: Yawn)
Shadow Scale by Rachel Hartman
Rating: Okay (Hated-Disliked-Okay-Liked-Loved)



When I reviewed the first Seraphina book, I loved it so much I couldn't decide which reason for loving it to write about first. Unfortunately, for book two, I have the opposite problem.

There were two main reasons this book didn't work for me. In no special order:

In the first book, it was the dragons ("saar" -- a dragon in human form) that were the most interesting element of the story. They were such an fascinating, utterly foreign culture. In Shadow Scale, the saars were absent for literally half of the book -- the first 50% of the book was about the half-dragon Seraphina and her search for others like her. Even when they started showing up again in the second half, they still had very little screen time.

The driving force of this book was conflict with a villain. Unfortunately the character never for a moment worked for me. I did not believe she was ever a threat. I didn't believe the power she had could be used the way she used it. I did not believe how the entire world reacted to her. Basically she came off as a boogeyman to me, but the story characters treated her like the most powerful creature that ever walked the planet.

Unfortunately the story dragged so badly. While I flew through the first book, it felt like this one took months to read. (Though by the date on my previous review, it took "only" three weeks.)

There were a number of good elements to the story, but unfortunately they weren't enough to save it for me:

The quigutl: Lizard-like people. Their culture was amazingly interesting. I wish the whole book had been about them instead of just a couple chapters. I loved them to death -- I felt about them in this book as I had the saar in the first book. While I have no desire to reread this book, I'd happily reread their chapters over and over.

The writing: The technical writing, I mean. Rachel Hartman constructs very nice sentences, she's really clever with her wording, and has an enjoyable vocabulary.

(Edit: I forgot a good part. Spoilers for details about characters. One of the characters, a strong female character, was transsexual. I don't think I've read a YA book with a trans character before! And one of the main female characters was lesbian, which was quite cool as well.)

The ending of the book was the biggest letdown for me, though the epilogue was touching. In a world where every YA book seems to be part of a trilogy, it seems like this series might just be the two books.

As a final note: It's possible my expectations were so high that there's no way this book could have lived up to them. I loved the first book on a "Best book ever!" level. I know a number of people reading this are either looking forward to the second book or are intending to read the both of them; I hope that my review can reset expectations so you all are able to enjoy Shadow Scale more than I did.
thistlechaser: (Book with cat: hugging book)
Seraphina by Rachel Hartman
Rating: Loved (Hated-Disliked-Okay-Liked-Loved)



Holy cow, guys, this has been a good year for books so far. Each book I read is better than the last, and I suspect it's going to go on for at least the next book.

I've been sitting here for a few minutes now, trying to decide what was the very best part of this book so I could start the review with that, but I just can't narrow it down. So, in no special order:

- The worldbuilding: So often this is my favorite thing about a good book, and it was done so very well in Seraphina! While it was set in a fantasy world where dragons exist and often walk around looking like people, it couldn't have been more believable. I especially loved the religious system and how it worked itself into the world. Examples: When a baby is born, a book containing all of the many, many saints is dropped, and the page it opens to is that baby's patron saint. Also, whenever someone who died is mentioned, the speaker always includes a bit about the saint in the comment. "We lost dear dad last year, may his soul forever rest on Saint Whoever's hearth, and so all of us kids had to take over tending the farm." Just a short phrase, only part of a sentence, but it gave such an interesting glimpse into their religious system.

- The dragons: Really part of the worldbuilding, I guess, but they were a big enough part of the book that they deserve mention on their own. I 100% bought the dragons as both an alien species, fully different than people, but also individuals within that species. I loved the idea that they were able to walk around as human as well (though almost none of them could act convincingly human, they just didn't understand or value humans enough to learn how).

- The human characters: Gah! The main character was so believable and realistic, strong yet flawed. I loved her love interest, and the romance did not bother me even one tiny little bit (so rare in a YA book!). I bought every character, from minor to major.

- The writing: Wow. Rachel Hartman can write so well! I feel like I should be able to phrase that better "writes so well" seems so generic and boring. I had not one issue with her writing (again, so rare), and in the entire book only spotted one error (more of an editing miss than a problem with the writing). A section near the ending made me tear up and laugh at the same time -- I cannot remember the last time a book did that.

Plot-wise, Seraphina is the story of a post-war nation. Once humans and dragons were at war, but it ended and now both races are trying to move forward... except some are not happy about that peace and the idea of working together with the other race. Hm, writing that out here, it sounds kind of generic, but the plotline really works. The main character is caught in the middle of the two groups, and the focus is on her trying to navigate through it all.

I highly recommend this book!

Next up: Shadow Scale (Seraphina, #2) by Rachel Hartman.

Edit: This author did something I've seen before, though rarely. She often used the phrase "quit the room" as in "left the room". Is that a British-English phrase? I've only seen it in a couple other books.
thistlechaser: (fox - talking)
Seraphina by Rachel Hartman
Rating: Liked (Hated-Disliked-Okay-Liked-Loved)
(Book received free for review from Random House.)



The good: I loved the author's writing. Her world was detailed and interesting, and she quickly drew me into the story.

The bad: This was a "chapter sample". I've never been given one of those for review before. (Thus the short review, how much can you say about a chapter sample?)

The future: I already bought a copy of the complete book, which I'll read and review next.

---

RL happenings: Like many people who live in an apartment, I hate my upstairs neighbors. Oh but I have really good reason to. They're the kind who cannot wake up when their alarm goes off. They let it sound for many minutes before they turn it off. This is a problem as they get up at 2 AM, 3 AM, 4 AM, or 4:45 AM. Every morning. Weekends included.

Once they're up, they're VERY loud. Stomping and yelling to each other. Run the dishwasher at 4 AM? Sure! This morning, Sunday morning, they were using their washing machine at 5 AM. But hey, I was awake at 4 AM thanks to them already, so no big deal?

I'm the type who, once they wake up, they're awake -- there's no going back to sleep for me. That means I tend to be very, very tired.

This morning they were especially loud, including what sounded like them throwing everything they own down the stairs. Turns out that was basically what they were doing. Looks like they were moving out, YAY. Sleep! Perhaps tonight I'll get a full night's rest!
thistlechaser: (Book with cat: hugging book)
Paint by Jennifer Dance
Rating: Loved (Hated-Disliked-Okay-Liked-Loved)
(Book received free for review from Dundurn Press.)



I had thought Paint would be a "talking animal" story -- a tale told from the animal's point of view. While there were short sections and chapters that were, most of the story was told by and about the humans. And know what? That was perfectly fine. This was one great book!

While the horse named Paint was the thing that tied the story together, the book was more a look at life in the late 1800s in Canada. Paint's mother, a wild mustang, died while giving birth, and the foal was found and raised by a Native American boy. The reader got to experience and learn about life in the Lakota tribe during the period of early contact with Europeans. Then an attack by the army set Paint free, until she was caught by her next owner.

A man who sold buffalo hunting trips (like modern day safaris) used her for a time, and we the readers got to learn about that practice -- who went on such trips, what the results were, etc. When that man retired (buffalo becoming harder and harder to find, and he was quite rich by that time), Paint got sold to English pioneers trying to settle in the Canadian wilds.

While this was a young adult book, it was the kind that an adult could not just absolutely enjoy, but love. I learned so much from this book! To be honest, I don't think about Canada all that much (sorry you northern people on my friends list!), I hadn't ever thought about what life would have been like there in the early days. A book that can offer both a great story and teach me things will always have a place in my heart.

While this was a YA book, the ending was unexpected. It wasn't outright stated, but any adult would be certain that Paint had been killed. Younger readers had room to hope she just left, but there's no way a very old horse could survive outside in a duststorm (storm of the century-level storm) that lasted for a whole day. I loved the ending so much.

The only thing about the book I didn't like, and sadly my last impression of it, was the epilogue. The final 10% of the book was Paint's original owner, now an elderly man, talking to his granddaughter about how badly the Europeans treated his people. True? Yes, for sure. But it felt so heavy-handed and unlike the rest of the book: Just an information dump and very little story.

I'd highly recommend Paint, just skip the epilogue.
thistlechaser: (Book with cat 2)
Samurai Jack Volume 3: Quest For The Broken Blade by Jim Zub (Author), Ethen Beavers (Illustrator), Andy Suriano (Illustrator)
Rating: Liked (Hated-Disliked-Okay-Liked-Loved)
(Book received free for review from IDW Publishing.)



I've missed watching Samurai Jack on TV, so when I was offered this graphic novel to review, I jumped at the chance. I wasn't disappointed, it read just like an episode of the cartoon!

Love Volume 1: The Tiger by Federico Bertolucci
Rating: Loved (Hated-Disliked-Okay-Liked-Loved)
(Book received free for review from Diamond Book Distributors.)



I loved Loved. Another graphic novel, this one about the life of a tiger. Told with no text, panel after panel was wonderfully drawn colored pencil artwork of the tiger's life. Every page was a thing of beauty.

The tiger and other animals weren't anthropomorphized at all, other than rare occasion where an eye looked a little human-ish to better show what was going on in the scene.

(Graphic novels don't count towards my 50 book per year goal, so these two reviews aren't numbered.)
thistlechaser: (Book with cat: hugging book)
Island Fire by Toby Neal
Rating: Liked (Hated-Disliked-Okay-Liked-Loved)
(Book received free for review.)



When a self-published book is full of editing or format errors, the writing and story are usually of the same quality. Island Fire is the first self-published book I've encountered that, though it had many, many formatting errors, was really well written and had an interesting story.

A young adult book, it's set on a Hawaiian island. It follows what happens to a few teens after some kind of solar event causes all electronic things to fail, including knocking planes out of the sky.

The author does so many good things:

- She doesn't rush the story. So often writers jump right into the action and plot without taking the time to introduce their characters and setting. Neal has a wonderful sense of pace.
- Love triangles in YA books are usually horribly painful to read. Island Fire was one of the very few times I've not only not minded, but actually liked how it was handled. It was never annoying. Though the girl was undecided about which boy she liked, it was never drama for the sake of drama. (And she did something I've always wished these girls would do: She thought 'Why can't I just like them both?'.)
- Her characters were fully believable as teens, and yet not annoying. Too many YA books fail at this.
- She really knew her setting. Google tells me she's lived her life in Hawaii, and it shows.

Unfortunately the issues with formatting were just as numerous as the good points of her writing and story:

- Every couple pages, a paragraph would have a random line break in the middle of it.
- Random characters in the middle of line breaks, a short series of numbers or numbers and letters.
- The book's title randomly appeared at the bottom of the page now and then.
- The start of every new chapter was messed up. First letter on its own line and the rest of the line in randomly alternating caps and lower case. For example, the first chapter starts like this:

N
Ick WEBSTER HELd HIS BackPack close

The author credits a formatting service. I'd suggest she should try to get her money back. The formatting issues were depressing; the writing and story were so good, they deserved better than the format treatment they got.

Still, it's a book well worth reading. It's also a becoming-rare complete story -- while there's room for a second or third book if the author chooses to continue it, it's a self-contained tale. No cliffhangers, everything's wrapped up nicely. There were unanswered questions, but even though some were big ones, they were also less important. Everything character-related got tied up by the end of the story. (Edit: Belatedly I see it was marked "book 1 in Island Series", so I guess it will be continued. It's nice for the first book in a series to be a complete story though.)

I enjoyed Island Fire for many reasons, but all the format errors mean I have to rank it a 'liked' instead of 'loved'.
thistlechaser: (Book with cat: Litterbox)
Go Down, Aaron by Chris Davidson
Rating: Hated (Loved-Liked-OK-Disliked-Hated)

Cover image - linked for NWSness.

While this book was only 50 pages long, I couldn't get even a quarter through it. I had been hoping it would be amusingly bad, but instead it was just bad-bad with a heaping helping of distasteful. (I know, who would have thought that Nazi porn would be distasteful?)

The story was bad, the porn was bad, this book had no redeeming features other than the semi-amusing cover.

How bad was the story? Aaron was captured and raped by a dozen or so Nazis and then sent off to a concentration camp, but escaped, then was recaptured. Major story events, right? From the end of the rape to the recapture, the author took one single sentence to explain the whole sent off to camp/escaped events! One sentence!

Two head-scratching quotes from the book, mildly NWS. )

I don't think I've ever been so relieved to give up on a book. Even WEREBEES, TAKEN BY THE SWARM was better! And that were-warthog book! (It'll never stop amusing me that the WEREBEES title is supposed to be in all-caps.)
thistlechaser: (Cat with book: Toy)
Kiteman of Karanga by Alfred Reynolds
Rating: Disliked (Loved-Liked-OK-Disliked-Hated)



There are a number of things a story needs for it to be worth reading: Believable characters, realistic dialogue, and a believable setting. This book had none of those. Also, though it came from a major publisher, it had a number of grammar errors (repeated lack of apostrophe when referring to possessive).

The dialogue was the biggest issue, and kept knocking me out of the story. I just could not believe that any person would give information out to that extent and phrase it like the characters did. But that I didn't believe even basic worldbuilding facts about the setting didn't help, and most of the characters were just cardboard cutouts...

But the biggest issue? On this fantasy world where dinosaurs terrys roamed, the main character's name was Karl.



Everyone in the story had wacky fantasy-ish names, except Carl Karl.



I know it's not the author's fault, the book was published in 1985 -- long before The Walking Dead, but all I could think about was that character and all the countless memes around.



I pushed myself to stick with Kiteman, and got to the 28% point, but that's well short of 50%, so this doesn't count towards my 2015 book goal.
thistlechaser: (Book with cat: rainbow)
I finally found a copy of a doozy of a book. Nazi gay porn from 1967.

Front and back cover images, potentially offensive. NWS? Cover of a 1960s book, but very suggestive. )

I'm hoping this will be bad of the amusingly-bad variety. I'm going to try to read it tomorrow or over the weekend.

I really should officially review that porn book from the 1970s that I have around here somewhere. There's no mention of it or the author anywhere online, so it would be nice to have some record of it out there. It was amusingly bad as well. (Edit: Oops, apparently it was copyrighted in 1981, so just barely not the 70s. Unlike when I last posted about it in 2010 (NWS) it now has an entry in Google that isn't my LJ! Amazon has it for sale for $20. That's nice, I'm glad it exists somewhere else besides my LJ now.)

Edit 2: I read the first chapter of Go Down, Aaron before bed. I kept notes as I read along.

NWS! TW: Rape. )
thistlechaser: (Cat with book: Toy)
Shadows Beneath: The Writing Excuses Anthology by Brandon Sanderson, Mary Robinette Kowal, Dan Wells, and Howard Tayler
Rating: Okay (Hated-Disliked-Okay-Liked-Loved)



Depending on what you're seeking from it, this could be a great book or a mostly okay book. If you're interested in the writing process, you'll get probably more than you could ever want from Shadows Beneath. If you're looking for a collection of short stories, there are four.

The book is set up like this:
- Author's final version of the story.
- Transcript of the brainstorming between the four authors on how to write the story, issues with it, everything from large worldbuilding things to tiny details.
- Author's first draft of the story.
- The story with 'editing marks' to show you the difference between the two. (The only editing marks are underscores, for text added to the first draft, and strikeouts, for text removed.)

While I love learning about the writing process, there was way, way too much "other stuff" in this book. For me, I would have liked to keep the first two pieces (final story and brainstorming transcript), and maybe a couple pages of the first draft and edited version. After I read the story once, I had very little desire to read basically the same story a second time, and no desire to read it a third.

All of the stories were really good.
“Sixth of the Dusk” (Brandon Sanderson) - Novella. I reviewed it as my last book of 2014.

“A Fire in the Heavens” (Mary Robinette Kowal) - Novella. A woman on a journey across the sea to find her ancestors encountered things she never expected.

“I.E.Demon” (Dan Wells) - Very, very short story. An amusing look at the US military using demons in warfare.

“An Honest Death” (Howard Taylor) - Very short story. Death himself comes a callin' on the CEO of a company that has invented a way for humans to be immortal.

As good as the stories were, I don't think the four of them were worth a $10 price, especially since I had (mistakenly) bought and paid for Sixth of the Dusk already.

I'd give this one a pass on buying, but if you could borrow a copy, that'd be worth it.

Profile

thistlechaser: (Default)
thistlechaser

September 2023

S M T W T F S
      12
34567 89
1011 12131415 16
17 181920212223
24252627282930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 3rd, 2025 04:53 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios